|
Shaft Deflection VS Shape | |||
Post Reply | Forum |
Posted by: zz6t2h ® 01/13/2006, 11:14:28 Author Profile eMail author Edit |
My argument is that a round shaft with flats machined on the sides deflects less than the original round shaft. I would like to find data to either support or dispute this premise. |
Post Reply | Recommend | Alert Administrator | View All | | Next | |
Replies to this message |
Re: Shaft Deflection VS Shape | |||
Re: Shaft Deflection VS Shape -- zz6t2h | Post Reply | Top of thread | Forum |
Posted by: ChrisMEngr ® 01/13/2006, 20:51:25 Author Profile eMail author Edit |
Zekeman is right. Look up "section modulus" You can calculate it in different ways depending on your cross sectional geometry. Also look up "beam deflection formuluas" This should help you out. |
Post Reply | Recommend | Alert Administrator | Where am I? Original Top of thread |
Re: Shaft Deflection VS Shape | |||
Re: Shaft Deflection VS Shape -- zz6t2h | Post Reply | Top of thread | Forum |
Posted by: zekeman ® 01/13/2006, 17:43:56 Author Profile eMail author Edit |
Impossible, since the deflection is inversely proportonal to the section moment of inertia, it follows that if you shave off any material anywhere, that inertia is reduced and the deflection, consequently increased for the same loading. |
Post Reply | Recommend | Alert Administrator | Where am I? Original Top of thread | | | |
Powered by Engineers Edge
© Copyright 2000 - 2024, by Engineers Edge, LLC All rights reserved. Disclaimer