|
Design and Engineering Forum |
[Home] [Design Resources] |
[ POSTING POLICY / RULES ][Archive#1] [Archive #2] [Archive #3] [Calculators] |
|
structural support for a raised platform | |||
Post Reply | Forum |
Posted by: smd79 ® 07/29/2004, 08:55:23 Author Profile Mail author Edit |
Hi, I have designed a safety walkway platform and have a question regarding the integrity of the column support I need. The platform is 13' high and supported from the ground. The platform itself is 30"x30" so these support legs aren't really far apart, and I am concerned about the platform tipping over and/or buckling. What can i do to prevent these failures from occuring? |
Post Reply | Recommend | Alert | Rate | View All | | Next | |
Replies to this message |
Re: structural support for a raised platform | |||
Re: structural support for a raised platform -- smd79 | Post Reply | Top of thread | Forum |
Posted by: smd79 ® 08/04/2004, 10:06:50 Author Profile Mail author Edit |
Hi and thanks everyone,
yeah I will be adding some horizontal beams for structural support.
I have generated a table with all the critical load/stress values for the different 2x2 leg thicknesses (0.065" - 0.25"), and it ranges from 10.4 to 12.4 MPa. Now this is for each column, therefore im assuming with 4 columns the structure is even stronger.
Furthermore, I calculated the stress on a column if I applied a 1000kg load (which is 10 times what i expect to actually be applied). Now as long as the critical stress I calculated is greater than the applied stress I should be safe, correct? The legs would be stainless steel, and used a value of 200 GPa for the modulus of elasticity.
here are the values for a 2x2 - 0.25" thick square tube
critical load = 11700 N
critical stress = 10.4 MPa
applied stress of 1000kg = 8.7 MPa
do these numbers make sense? Any input is very much appreciated.
Thank you once again
Shawn. Modified by smd79 at Wed, Aug 04, 2004, 10:15:44 |
Post Reply | Recommend | Alert | Rate | Where am I? Original Top of thread | | | |
Re: structural support for a raised platform | |||
Re: Re: structural support for a raised platform -- smd79 | Post Reply | Top of thread | Forum |
Posted by: angelos ® 08/05/2004, 16:43:17 Author Profile Mail author Edit |
It is sure that your structure will not break down due to overstress . You shouldn't even think to make a walkway platform with applied stress in the same rank with critical stress. (i mean that applied stress must be far far smaller than critical , 0-5 % i suggest ). Your platform has to be stable. This will only occur if you put rigidly the columns in a proper base. And the horizontal beams will not help at all. Imagine this-- You will have a strong box [12' x 30'' x 30''] but nothing will prevent this box to overturn. Finally you have to calculate the stess that will occur due to the bend .-- the lenght of the columns is bigger than the critical so the columns are more likely to break down due to bend than overstress.
|
Post Reply | Recommend | Alert | Rate | Where am I? Original Top of thread |
Re: structural support for a raised platform | |||
Re: structural support for a raised platform -- smd79 | Post Reply | Top of thread | Forum |
Posted by: angelos ® 08/02/2004, 12:24:32 Author Profile Mail author Edit |
If the legs are rigidly supported from the ground (ex. concrete base,1.5' depth ) then your platform is very safe and stable. If not I believe that the only reasonable solution to your problem, is to construct a proper base (made of concrete). If you try to add diagonial or horizontial beams you will only make the whole structure more expensive . |
Post Reply | Recommend | Alert | Rate | Where am I? Original Top of thread | | | |
Re: structural support for a raised platform | |||
Re: structural support for a raised platform -- smd79 | Post Reply | Top of thread | Forum |
Posted by: acroduster1 ® 07/30/2004, 15:30:00 Author Profile Mail author Edit |
If you use X bracing, no larger size columns or special base plate detailing would be needed. They're not so good standing on their own, but even if you just brace them to the middle (one brace point half way up), they'd be good for around 24,000 lbs of axial load EACH (assuming they are 1/4" wall thickness and made of 36ksi steel). Bracing them only in the dead center would look funny, though, so I recommend going with 4 "bays" of bracing, breaking the column into 4 equal parts of the same length. By the way, in this application, you don't need X bracing. You can use single braces going one way diagonally then horizontally across to the next one forming a zig-zag shape. If they're designed correctly you'll save material and fit up costs. Acro |
Post Reply | Recommend | Alert | Rate | Where am I? Original Top of thread | | | |
Re: structural support for a raised platform | |||
Re: structural support for a raised platform -- smd79 | Post Reply | Top of thread | Forum |
Posted by: Cragyon ® 07/29/2004, 10:24:13 Author Profile Mail author Edit |
Well, to calculate the "buckling load" on the vertical support visit the following page /column_buckling/column_ideal.htm . In general, it is a lot easier to simply over design the structure. I would add a couple of "X" cross braces between all of the legs as well as double the size of the vertical supports. You can simply weld another 2" x 2" tubular cross section parallel and onto the current supporting legs. Better be safe than sorry. |
Post Reply | Recommend | Alert | Rate | Where am I? Original Top of thread | | | |
Re: structural support for a raised platform | |||
Re: Re: structural support for a raised platform -- Cragyon | Post Reply | Top of thread | Forum |
Posted by: brewnog ® 07/29/2004, 11:47:43 Author Profile Mail author Edit |
Over-engineering is definitely the way forward, for the minimal extra expense involved. Make sure the bottoms of the columns are fixed very rigidly to the floor somehow, (fabricating a proper base might help) as you may then be able to model these as rigid (rather than pin-jointed) supports, and be even more confident of your calculations! |
Post Reply | Recommend | Alert | Rate | Where am I? Original Top of thread |
Powered by Engineers Edge
© Copyright 2000 - 2024, by Engineers Edge, LLC All rights reserved. Disclaimer